Could dinosaur DNA really survive in amber?


Steven Spielberg’s Jurassic Park gave rise to the legend that DNA could resurrect dinosaurs in the future. Is this science fiction really science fact?

the original jurassic park is a timeless film filled with fantastic sci-fi, but it needs some major scientific verification. Can amber really preserve dinosaur DNA to survive over time? Whether it’s pure fiction or truth, the question has become a central vexation for fans of Universal Studios’ dinosaur epic that spawned a massive franchise.

Considered a gargantuan classic of the 20th century, jurassic park was directed by Steven Spielberg for release in the summer of 1993. jurassic park, an adaptation of Michael Crichton’s 1990 novel, suggests that scientists found fragmented dinosaur DNA and managed to fill in the genetic holes with frog DNA. The intrepid John Hammond used this technology to open Jurassic Park, an ambitious theme park where dinosaurs are the main attraction. Jurassic Park was determined to emphasize real-world science and allow the idea to seem feasible.


Related: Dominion Can Finally Separate Jurassic World From The Original Movies

Although this may be a disappointment for those hoping to piece together jurassic park, dinosaur genes confined in amber could not survive to the present day. Famously, the film illustrated the concept of dinosaur blood trapped inside hardened fossilized tree resin (amber), which remained viable for analysis and reproduction for millions of years. In reality, the blood and tissue of a once-living creature cannot remain intact for millions of years inside amber, which means there would be no viable DNA to to study. Although this might be a good idea, the preservative properties of amber have their limits, and DNA could not survive even in a partially decomposed form as with jurassic park. So while the concept of cloning an animal from DNA is feasible and may seem to mean that Jurassic parkDinosaur experiment makes sense, failure to find preserved DNA in amber means John Hammond wouldn’t have been able to bring back extinct dinosaurs this way in Jurassic Park.

John Hammond Jurassic park Jurassic World Mosquito

The conceptual idea of ​​dinosaur cloning presented in jurassic park was based around a large and compelling lab with comprehensive explanations of genetic science. This made audiences buy the DNA in Amber story as realistic and many believed it. A generation of fans grew up accepting jurassic park was based on science that was just a good discovery far from real. However, however persuasive the argument advanced in jurassic park might be about dinosaur DNA and the plausibility of life preserved in amber, there’s little hope for die-hard fans of Spielberg’s giant dinosaur that they can truly revive an extinct species in this way.

While a mosquito trapped in amber wouldn’t be a viable source of dinosaur DNA, there have been some brief glimmers of hope for fans to bring deadly creatures back from extinction. In one case, preserved insect blood was found in ancient lake sediments rather than amber. According to this real-life study of the Eocene-era insect, scientists saw red pigment in its abdomen. What was left inside the insect were the breakdown products of hemoglobin, proteins found in all vertebrates. Similarly, in another important paleontological discovery, red blood cells were extracted from a fossilized dinosaur bone derived from the Cretaceous period. Unfortunately, it’s important to remember that blood doesn’t necessarily equate to DNA when viewed on this massive timescale. DNA breaks down quickly and is very vulnerable to time. Without DNA, the science that jurassic park suggests is real can never be a reality. It looks like the franchise won’t be moving away from that sci-fi element any time soon, as the idea of ​​dinosaurs starting out as a science experiment is referenced in the amber-hued poster for the planned 2022 sequel. Jurassic World: Dominion. Fact check jurassic park proves that prehistoric amber is not the best container for genetic preservation and could not keep dinosaur DNA intact for millennia, and it seems unlikely that anything could have preserved that DNA by coincidence on such a long period. Strange as it may sound, the legendary rumor is likely to remain in the public sphere of consciousness for years to come, despite the fact that the jurassic park The franchise is fundamentally built on an unsustainable dream.

Next: Jurassic World Dominion Trailer May Hint at New Jurassic Park

Morbius Venom

Morbius Box Office Debut Projected As Spider-Man’s Lowest Live-Action Movie

About the Author


Comments are closed.