Translational science: a survey of the perspectives and practices of American biomedical researchers

0
  • 1.

    Ioannidis, JPA Why Most Published Research Results Are Wrong. PLoS Med. 2, e124 (2005).

    Google Scholar article

  • 2.

    Baker, M. 1,500 scientists lift the veil on reproducibility. Nat. News 533, 452 (2016).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 3.

    Munafò, MR et al. A manifesto for reproducible science. Nat. Hmm. Behave yourself. 1, 0021 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 4.

    Begley, CG & Ellis, LM Drug Development: Raising Standards for Preclinical Cancer Research. Nature 483, 531-533 (2012).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 5.

    Prinz, F., Schlange, T. & Asadullah, K. Believe it or not: How confident can we be in the published data on potential drug targets? Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. ten, 712 (2011).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 6.

    Seok, J. et al. Genomic responses in mouse models poorly mimic human inflammatory diseases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. United States 110, 3507-3512 (2013).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • seven.

    Mogil, JS Animal models of pain: progress and challenges. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. ten, 283-294 (2009).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 8.

    Mak, IWY, Evaniew, N. & Ghert, M. Lost in Translation: Animal Models and Clinical Trials in Cancer Treatment. A m. J. Trad. Res. 6, 114-118 (2014).

    PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 9.

    Dawson, TM, Golde, TE & Lagier-Tourenne, C. Animal models of neurodegenerative diseases. Nat. Neurosks. 21, 1370-1379 (2018).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • ten.

    van der Worp, HB et al. Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies? PLoS Med. seven, e1000245 (2010).

    Google Scholar article

  • 11.

    Scott, S. et al. Design, Power, and Interpretation of Studies in the Standard Mouse Model of ALS. Amyotrophic. Lateral scler. 9, 4-15 (2008).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 12.

    Garner, JP, Gaskill, BN, Weber, EM, Ahloy-Dallaire, J. & Pritchett-Corning, KR Presentation of therioepistemology: the study of how knowledge is acquired through animal research. Laboratory Anim. (NEW YORK) 46, 103-113 (2017).

    Google Scholar article

  • 13.

    Muhlhausler, BS, Bloomfield, FH & Gillman, MW Whole animal experiments should look more like randomized controlled trials in humans. PLoS Biol. 11, e1001481 (2013).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 14.

    Peers, IS, Ceuppens, PR & Harbron, C. In Search of Preclinical Robustness. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 11, 733-734 (2012).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 15.

    Kilkenny, C. et al. Investigation of the quality of the experimental design, statistical analysis and reporting of research using animals. PLoS A 4, e7824 (2009).

  • 16.

    Beynen, AC, Gärtner, K. & van Zutphen, LFM In Principles of Laboratory Animal Science (ed. Zutphen, LFM, Baumans, V. & Beynen, AC) 103-110 (Elsevier, 2001).

  • 17.

    Barbee, RW & Turner, PV Integrating Laboratory Animal Science into Responsible Biomedical Research. ILAR J. 60, 9-16 (2019).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 18.

    Kilkenny, C., Browne, WJ, Cuthill, IC, Emerson, M. & Altman, DG Improving Bioscience Research Reporting: ARRIVE Guidelines for Reporting Animal Research. PLoS Biol. 8, e1000412 (2010).

    Google Scholar article

  • 19.

    Percie du Sert, N. et al. ARRIVE 2.0 Guidelines: Updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 18, e3000410 (2020).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 20.

    National Research Council. Guide to the care and use of laboratory animals 8th edition (The National Academies Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar

  • 21.

    Russell, WMS and Burch, RL The principles of human experimental technique. (Federation of Universities for Animal Welfare, 1959).

    Google Scholar

  • 22.

    LaFollette, H. & Shanks, N. The Raw Science: The Dilemmas of Animal Testing (Routledge, 2020).

  • 23.

    Pound, P., Ebrahim, S., Sandercock, P., Bracken, MB & Roberts, I. Where is the evidence that animal research benefits humans? Fr. Med. J. 328, 514-517 (2004).

    Google Scholar article

  • 24.

    Greek, CR & Greek, JS Sacred Cows and Golden Geese: The Human Cost of Animal Experiments. (A&C Black, 2000).

  • 25.

    Jones, J. & Saad, L. Gallup Poll Social Series: Values ​​and Beliefs. Available at https://www.gallup.com/201200/gallup-poll-social-series-work.aspx (2019).

  • 26.

    Strauss, M. Americans are divided over the use of animals in scientific research. Available at https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2018/08/16/americans-are-divided-over-the-use-of-animals-in-scientific-research/ (2018).

  • 27.

    Lankau, EW, Turner, PV, Mullan, RJ & Galland, GG Use of non-human primates in research in North America. Jam. Assoc. Laboratory. Anim. Sci. 53, 278-282 (2014).

    CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar

  • 28.

    Magden, ER, Mansfield, KG, Simmons, JH & Abee, CR en Laboratory animal medicine 3rd Edition (ed. Fox, J. G, Anderson, LC, Otto, GM Pritchett-Corning, KR & Whary, MT) 771-930 (Academic Press, 2015).

  • 29.

    Baker, KC & Dettmer, AM The welfare of non-human laboratory primates. A m. J. Primatol. 79, e22520 (2017).

  • 30.

    Colman, RJ et al. Marmosets: welfare, ethical use, and IACUC / regulatory considerations. ILAR J. https://doi.org/10.1093/ilar/ilab003 (2021).

  • 31.

    Rader, K. Making Mice: Standardization of Animals for American Biomedical Research, 1900-1955 (Princeton University Press, 2004).

  • 32.

    Perlman, RL Murine models of human disease: an evolutionary perspective. Evol. Med. Public health 1, 170-176 (2016).

    Google Scholar

  • 33.

    Courtine, G. et al. Can experiments on non-human primates accelerate the translation of treatments for spinal cord injury in humans? Nat. Med. 13, 561-566 (2007).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 34.

    Colman, RJ Non-human primates as a model of aging. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Say. basic. 1864, 2733-2741 (2018).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 35.

    Perrin, S. Preclinical Research: Making Mouse Studies Work. Nat. News 507, 423-425 (2014).

    Google Scholar article

  • 36.

    Richter, SH, Garner, JP & Würbel, H. Environmental standardization: remedy or cause of poor reproducibility in animal experiments. Nat. Methods 6, 257-261 (2009).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 37.

    Voelkl, B. et al. Reproducibility of animal research in the light of biological variation. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 21, 384-393 (2020).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 38.

    Laukens, D., Brinkman, BM, Raes, J., De Vos, M. & Vandenabeele, P. Gut microbiome heterogeneity in mice: guidelines for optimizing the experimental design. FEMS Microbiol. Tower. 40, 117-132 (2016).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 39.

    Willmann, R. et al. Improving Translation: Guidelines for Standard Preclinical Experiments in mdx mouse. Neuromuscular. Disorder 22, 43-49 (2012).

    Google Scholar article

  • 40.

    Eisner, DA Reproducibility of Science: Fraud, Impact Factors, and Neglect. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 114, 364-368 (2018).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 41.

    Fang, FC, Bennett, JW & Casadevall, A. Men are over-represented among life science researchers who make scientific mistakes. Mbio 4, e00640-12 (2013).

  • 42.

    Everitt, JI & Berridge, BR The role of the IACUC in the design and conduct of animal experiments that contribute to translational success. ILAR J. 58, 129-134 (2017).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 43.

    Pritt, S., McNulty, JA, Greene, M., Light, S. & Brown, M. Reducing the regulatory burden imposed by institutions for animal research. Laboratory Anim. (NEW YORK) 45, 297-300 (2016).

    Google Scholar article

  • 44.

    National Research Council. Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. (National Academies Press, 2007).

    Google Scholar

  • 45.

    Festing, S. & Wilkinson, R. The ethics of animal research: discussion point on the use of animals in scientific research. EMBO representative 8, 526-530 (2007).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 46.

    DeGrazia, D. The ethics of animal research: what prospects for agreement? Cam. Q. Santéc. Ethics 8, 23-34 (1999).

    Google Scholar CAS Article

  • 47.

    Wadman, M. Hundreds of American Scientists Call for More Transparency in Animal Research. Available at https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/06/hundreds-us-scientists-urge-more-transparency-animal-research (2018).

  • 48.

    Basel Declaration Society. Basel Declaration. A call for more trust, transparency and communication on animal research. Available at https://www.basel-declaration.org/basel-declaration/ (2010).

  • 49.

    MacArthur Clark, J., Clifford, P., Jarrett, W. & Pekow, C. Communicating animal research with the public. ILAR J. 60, 34-42 (2019).

    Google Scholar article

  • 50.

    Waltz, M., Saylor, KW, Fisher, JA & Walker, RL Biomedical Researchers’ Perceptions of NIH Policy on Sex as a Biological Variable for Animal Research: Findings from a US National Survey. J. Women’s health (Larchmt.) 30, 348-354 (2021).

    Google Scholar article

  • Share.

    Comments are closed.